SMB is not transparent and does not take into consideration the transparency of file sharing. Clients are able to see the process beforehand in NFS.

NFS is transparent between servers or desktops, or laptops.

NFS does not have a wide range of coverage though it allows sharing of both Windows and Linux/Unix files between systems.

CMB allows files to be shared in a wide range of networks, and hence its coverage is high.

NFS does its work silently without requiring many files for communication and documentation purposes.

CMB requires more files for its communication, and hence more documents are required for the same to share files in the network.

However, SMB works well with Windows files.

Additional software called Samba is required in SMB to access Linux/Unix files, whereas additional files are not required by NFS to share windows files.

If NFS is installed in Linux, windows files can also be shared using the NFS system. While NFS can be deployed in windows servers, NFS allows both Linux and Windows to share the files with other systems or networks.

Windows file sharing is usually carried out with SMB, and Linux/Unix file sharing is done with NFS.

Let us discuss some key differences between NFS vs SMB in the following points: Web development, programming languages, Software testing & others Start Your Free Software Development Course

Mount mac nfs share windows 10